Then log into the SP again using the cpmaint account via putty and select option It will step you through switching to RDA mode.
#3PAR SSMC DOWNLOAD PASSWORD#
You log into the SP via putty as your 3parcust account, then menu options 1, 14, 1, 4 to reset the password for cpmaint. Per the release notes displayed in the Bulletin you see when logging into the portal. It is planned to also support systems running 3. In this previous post available you can see more examples other reports InfoSight will make available. This happens mostly, if you have updated the Service Processor from 4. The account supplied needs to have read only access to the vCentre. Enter IP address, password and other relevant information for your vCenter. The exact steps you need to take will depend on the version of the Service Processor you are running.įirst we look at doing this with service processor 5. If the above requirements are in place you will then be able to complete the following high level steps to get InfoSight with cross-stack analytics. The Ports-Section therefore does not work at all for us.Before you register your system in InfoSight you need the following prerequisites in place. As soon as we click on "ports", we get an error "Your network connection may have been lost or the 3PAR StoreServ server may be down". Maybe with separated drive geometries in different colors? We'd like to create/have an own dashboard with this chart from every system all next to each other. We like the "historical capacity"-chart very much. How about adding a little "+" in front of system names? Clicking that -> "add to selection" and let menu stay visible, clicking the system name -> "change to that system" and close drop down menu. And then one more click to make the drop down list disappear. The "Systems" drop down lists acts "additive", so for changing systems you always have to click twice - select the new one, deselect the old one. Places 3 and 4 are correct when ordering alphabetically. Newly added systems appeared on places 3 and 5 in the drop down list, but places 3 and 4 in the left list in the systems-section (when "All Systems" is selected in drop down list). We have no idea how the actual sorting works. We would prefer alphabetically ordered drop down lists. It's a neat idea to help new customers get a system up and running, but it would really be cool if there was a checkbox "hide all that automatically created stuff like cpgs and vv-sets". The 200+ "RCP_xxx"-VVSets don't help at all in this regard. Same with VV-Sets: In the VV-Set-Part, we have to click "load more" very often until we see all of them.
Especially with dedup on systems with more the 64TB, you can't just use this automatically provisioned cpgs (you need a new cpg for every 64TB), and on systems you bought with InformOS prior to 3.1.2 you already had your CPGs when this cpgs (FC_r1 etc.) showed up. CPGs) when you click there for the first time, everything automatically created sucks: we have 18 3PAR systems, so there are lots of CPGS that are all called the same ("FC_r1", "FC_r5", etc), and the CPGs we actually use are spread among them.
As the left navigation pane often displays everything from every systems (e.g. Trim the last characters like IMC did if necessary, but please don't clutter the interface with wrapped around strings! One element - one line! We would prefer if ssmc displayed names of sets, vvs etc. Also in SSMC there does nto seem to be distinction of 15K vs. Compare to IMC where the layout is intuitive and logical. First few times I looked at this I have to spend time deciphering what I was really looking at for quantities. Total is fully left justified, then the drives counts are fully left justified, but the drive types and indented and dwarf the drive type. In the Physical drives pane not a fan of how the indentation is working. I will apologize now as I will likely post numerous items, but figured individual posts for each item will allow conversation on an each item rather than trying to comment on a massive list. I will post some of the 2.0 items as I suspect many still hold true, I will try and verify 2.0 items time permitting. I have been using SSMS for about 2 months now and recently went to 2.1. I will selectively post some of items I have already sent to HP to solicit feedback from others to see if I am off base or not.